Paper detail

Angular Momentum Loss Mechanisms in Cataclysmic Variables below the Period Gap

Mass transfer in cataclysmic variables (CVs) is usually considered to be caused by angular momentum loss (AML) driven by magnetic braking and gravitational radiation (GR) above the period gap, and solely by GR below the period gap. The best-fit revised model of CV evolution recently by \citet{kbp11}, however, indicates that AML rate below the period gap is $2.47(\pm 0.22)$ times the GR rate, suggesting the existence of some other AML mechanisms. We consider several kinds of consequential AML mechanisms often invoked in the literature: isotropic wind from the accreting white dwarfs, outflows from the Langrangian points, and the formation of a circumbinary disk. We found that neither isotropic wind from the white dwarf nor outflow from the $L_1$ point can explain the extra AML rate, while ouflow from the $L_2$ point or a circumbinary disk can effectively extract the angular momentum provided that $\sim (15-45)%$ of the transferred mass is lost from the binary. A more promising mechanism is a circumbinary disk exerting gravitational torque on the binary. In this case the mass loss fraction can be as low as $\lesssim 10^{-3}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.