Paper detail

Angular Momentum and Vortex Formation in Bose-Einstein-Condensed Cold Dark Matter Haloes

(Abridged) Extensions of the standard model of particle physics predict very light bosons, ranging from about 10^{-5} eV for the QCD axion to 10^{-33} eV for ultra-light particles, which could be the cold dark matter (CDM) in the Universe. If so, their phase-space density must be high enough to form a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). The fluid-like nature of BEC-CDM dynamics differs from that of standard collisionless CDM (sCDM), so observations of galactic haloes may distinguish them. sCDM has problems with galaxy observations on small scales, which BEC-CDM may overcome for a large range of particle mass m and self-interaction strength g. For quantum-coherence on galactic scales of radius R and mass M, either the de-Broglie wavelength lambda_deB <~ R, requiring m >~ m_H \cong 10^{-25}(R/100 kpc)^{-1/2}(M/10^{12} M_solar)^{-1/2} eV, or else lambda_deB << R but self-interaction balances gravity, requiring m >> m_H and g >> g_H \cong 2 x 10^{-64} (R/100 kpc)(M/10^{12} M_solar)^{-1} eV cm^3. Here we study the largely-neglected effects of angular momentum. Spin parameters lambda \cong 0.05 are expected from tidal-torquing by large-scale structure, just as for sCDM. Since lab BECs develop quantum vortices if rotated rapidly enough, we ask if this angular momentum is sufficient to form vortices in BEC haloes, affecting their structure with potentially observable consequences. The minimum angular momentum for this, L_{QM} = $\hbar M/m$, requires m >= 9.5 m_H for lambda = 0.05, close to the particle mass required to influence structure on galactic scales. We study the equilibrium of self-gravitating, rotating BEC haloes which satisfy the Gross-Pitaevskii-Poisson equations, to calculate if and when vortices are energetically favoured. Vortices form as long as self-interaction is strong enough, which includes a large part of the range of m and g of interest for BEC-CDM haloes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.