Paper detail

Angular momentum and galaxy formation revisited

Motivated by new kinematic data in the outer parts of early-type galaxies (ETGs), we re-examine angular momentum (AM) in all galaxy types. We present methods for estimating the specific AM j, focusing on ETGs, to derive relations between stellar j_* and mass M_* (after Fall 1983). We perform analyses of 8 galaxies out to ~10 R_e, finding that data at 2 R_e are sufficient to estimate total j_*. Our results contravene suggestions that ellipticals (Es) harbor large reservoirs of hidden j_* from AM transport in major mergers. We carry out a j_*-M_* analysis of literature data for ~100 nearby bright galaxies of all types. The Es and spirals form parallel j_*-M_* tracks, which for spirals is like the Tully-Fisher relation, but for Es derives from a mass-size-rotation conspiracy. The Es contain ~3-4 times less AM than equal-mass spirals. We decompose the spirals into disks+bulges and find similar j_*-M_* trends to spirals and Es overall. The S0s are intermediate, and we propose that morphological types reflect disk/bulge subcomponents following separate j_*-M_* scaling relations -- providing a physical motivation for characterizing galaxies by mass and bulge/disk ratio. Next, we construct idealized cosmological models of AM content, using a priori estimates of dark matter halo spin and mass. We find that the scatter in halo spin cannot explain the spiral/E j_* differences, but the data are matched if the galaxies retained different fractions of initial j (~60% and ~10%). We consider physical mechanisms for j_* and M_* evolution (outflows, stripping, collapse bias, merging), emphasizing that the vector sum of such processes must produce the observed j_*-M_* relations. A combination of early collapse and multiple mergers (major/minor) may account for the trend for Es. More generally, the observed AM variations represent fundamental constraints for any galaxy formation model.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.