Paper detail

Angular and spatial clustering of photometrically classified quasar candidates from SDSS NBCKDE

The present paper analyses the quasar clustering using the two-point correlation function (2pCF) and the largest existing sample of photometrically selected quasars: the SDSS NBCKDE catalogue (from the SDSS DR6). A new technique of random catalogue generation was developed for this purpose, that allows to take into account the original homogeneity of the survey without knowledge of its imaging mask. When averaged over photometrical redshifts 0.8<z_phot<2.2 the 2pCF of photometrically selected quasars is found to be approximated well with the power law w(θ)=(θ/θ_0)^{-α} with θ_0=4".5+/-1".4, α=0.94+/-0.06 over the range 1'<θ<40'. It agrees well with previous results by Myers et al. (2006,2007), obtained for samples of NBCKDE quasars with similar mean z_phot, but averaged over broader z_phot range. The parameters of the deprojected 2pCF averaged over the same z_phot range and modelled with a power law ξ(r)=(r/r_0)^{-γ}, are r_0=7.81^{+1.18}_{-1.16} Mpc/h, γ=1.94+/-0.06, which are in perfect agreement with previous results from spectroscopic surveys. We confirm the evidence for an increase of the clustering amplitude with z, and find no evidence for luminosity dependence of the quasar clustering. The latter is consistent with the models of the quasar formation, in which bright and faint quasars are assumed to be similar sources, hosted by dark matter halos of similar masses, but observed at different stages of their evolution. Comparison of our results with studies of the X-ray selected AGNs with similar z shows that the clustering amplitude of optically selected quasars is similar to that of X-ray selected quasars, but lower than that of samples of all X-ray selected AGNs. As the samples of all X-ray selected AGNs contain AGNs of both types, our result serves as an evidence for different types of AGNs to reside in different environments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.