Paper detail

And the winner is: galaxy mass

The environment is known to affect the formation and evolution of galaxies considerably best visible through the well-known morphology-density relationship. We study the effect of environment on the evolution of early-type galaxies for a sample of 3,360 galaxies morphologically selected by visual inspection from the SDSS in the redshift range 0.05<z<0.06, and analyse luminosity-weighted age, metallicity, and alpha/Fe ratio as function of environment and galaxy mass. We find that on average 10 per cent of early-type galaxies are rejuvenated through minor recent star formation. This fraction increases with both decreasing galaxy mass and decreasing environmental density. However, the bulk of the population obeys a well-defined scaling of age, metallicity, and alpha/Fe ratio with galaxy mass that is independent of environment. Our results contribute to the growing evidence in the recent literature that galaxy mass is the major driver of galaxy formation. Even the morphology-density relationship may actually be mass-driven, as the consequence of an environment dependent characteristic galaxy mass coupled with the fact that late-type galaxy morphologies are more prevalent in low-mass galaxies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.