Paper detail

Anchoring of Turbulent Premixed Hydrogen/Air Flames at Externally Heated Walls

A joint experimental and numerical investigation of turbulent flame front anchoring at externally heated walls is presented. The phenomenon is examined for lean hydrogen/air mixtures in a novel burner design, which comprises a cylindrical burning chamber converging into a glass pipe as well as a wall heating assembly at their intersection. The transparent part allows for optical OH* chemiluminescence measurements serving as a basis for numerical validation. For a comprehensive numerical evaluation the effect of heat loss on different hydrogen/air chemical reaction mechanisms is reviewed in a preparatory one-dimensional flame study. The subsequent numerical investigation focuses on the application of the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) as a turbulence-chemistry interaction model in the realm of wall anchoring turbulent flames. All simulations are based on the Reynolds time-averaged formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations and feature axisymmetric domains. The influence of different two-equation turbulence models and EDC modeling constants are discussed. Since wall heat transfer is responsible for ignition as well as quenching of the flame front, a special focus is put on boundary layer resolving near-wall treatment. A qualitative comparison between simulations and experiment is performed for multiple operating conditions. These are selected to display the influence of equivalence ratio, bulk Reynolds number and unburnt mixture temperature. While the choice of RANS-based turbulence model has a distinguishable impact, EDC modeling coefficients exhibit a more significant influence on flame shape and length. It is only surpassed by the impact of correct diffusion treatment on reacting lean hydrogen/air mixtures. To depict this behavior as accurately as possible, full multicomponent diffusion treatment using the Maxwell-Stefan equation is applied.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.