Paper detail

Anatomy of scalar mediated proton decays in $SO(10)$ models

Realistic models based on the renormalizable grand unified theories have varieties of scalars, many of which are capable of mediating baryon ($B$) and lepton ($L$) number non-conserving processes. We identify all such scalar fields residing in ${\bf 10}$, $\overline{\bf 126}$ and ${\bf 120}$ dimensional irreps of $SO(10)$ which can induce baryon and lepton number violating interactions through the leading order $d=6$ and $d=7$ operators. Explicitly computing their couplings with the standard model fermions, we derive the effective operators including the possibility of mixing between the scalars stemming from a given representation. We find that such interactions at $d=6$ are mediated by only three sets of scalars: $T(3,1,-1/3)$, ${\cal T} (3,1,-4/3)$ and $\mathbb{T}(3,3,-1/3)$ and their conjugates. In the models with ${\bf 10}$ and $\overline{\bf 126}$, only the first has appropriate couplings to mediate the proton decay. While ${\cal T}$ and $\mathbb{T}$ can induce baryon number violating interactions when ${\bf 120}$ is present, ${\cal T}$ does not contribute to the proton decay at tree level because of its flavour antisymmetric coupling. Three additional colour triplets and their conjugates can mediate nucleon decay via $d=7$ operators which violate also the $B-L$. We give general expressions for partial widths of proton in terms of the fundamental Yukawa couplings and use these results to explicitly compute the proton lifetime and branching ratios for the minimal non-supersymmetric $SO(10)$ model based on ${\bf 10}$ and $\overline{\bf 126}$ Higgs. We find that the proton preferably decays into $\overlineν\, K^+$ or $μ^+\, K^0$ and list several distinct features of scalar mediated proton decay. If the latter dominates over the gauge mediated contributions, the proton decay spectrum provides a direct probe to the flavour structure of the underlying grand unified theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.