Paper detail

Anatomically Parameterized Statistical Shape Model: Explaining Morphometry through Statistical Learning

Statistical shape models (SSMs) are a popular tool to conduct morphological analysis of anatomical structures which is a crucial step in clinical practices. However, shape representations through SSMs are based on shape coefficients and lack an explicit one-to-one relationship with anatomical measures of clinical relevance. While a shape coefficient embeds a combination of anatomical measures, a formalized approach to find the relationship between them remains elusive in the literature. This limits the use of SSMs to subjective evaluations in clinical practices. We propose a novel SSM controlled by anatomical parameters derived from morphometric analysis. The proposed anatomically parameterized SSM (ANAT-SSM) is based on learning a linear mapping between shape coefficients and selected anatomical parameters. This mapping is learned from a synthetic population generated by the standard SSM. Determining the pseudo-inverse of the mapping allows us to build the ANAT-SSM. We further impose orthogonality constraints to the anatomical parameterization to obtain independent shape variation patterns. The proposed contribution was evaluated on two skeletal databases of femoral and scapular bone shapes using clinically relevant anatomical parameters. Anatomical measures of the synthetically generated shapes exhibited realistic statistics. The learned matrices corroborated well with the obtained statistical relationship, while the two SSMs achieved moderate to excellent performance in predicting anatomical parameters on unseen shapes. This study demonstrates the use of anatomical representation for creating anatomically parameterized SSM and as a result, removes the limited clinical interpretability of standard SSMs. The proposed models could help analyze differences in relevant bone morphometry between populations, and be integrated in patient-specific pre-surgery planning or in-surgery assessment.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.