Paper detail

Analyzing the Reduced Required BS Density due to CoMP in Cellular Networks

In this paper we investigate the benefit of base station (BS) cooperation in the uplink of coordinated multi-point (CoMP) networks. Our figure of merit is the required BS density required to meet a chosen rate coverage. Our model assumes a 2-D network of BSs on a regular hexagonal lattice in which path loss, lognormal shadowing and Rayleigh fading affect the signal received from users. Accurate closed-form expressions are first presented for the sum-rate coverage probability and ergodic sum-rate at each point of the cooperation region. Then, for a chosen quality of user rate, the required density of BS is derived based on the minimum value of rate coverage probability in the cooperation region. The approach guarantees that the achievable rate in the entire coverage region is above a target rate with chosen probability. The formulation allows comparison between different orders of BS cooperation, quantifying the reduced required BS density from higher orders of cooperation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.