Paper detail

Analyzing the behaviour of D'WAVE quantum annealer: fine-tuning parameterization and tests with restrictive Hamiltonian formulations

Despite being considered as the next frontier in computation, Quantum Computing is still in an early stage of development. Indeed, current commercial quantum computers suffer from some critical restraints, such as noisy processes and a limited amount of qubits, among others, that affect the performance of quantum algorithms. Despite these limitations, researchers have devoted much effort to propose different frameworks for efficiently using these Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. One of these procedures is D'WAVE Systems' quantum-annealer, which can be use to solve optimization problems by translating them into an energy minimization problem. In this context, this work is focused on providing useful insights and information into the behaviour of the quantum-annealer when addressing real-world combinatorial optimization problems. Our main motivation with this study is to open some quantum computing frontiers to non-expert stakeholders. To this end, we perform an extensive experimentation, in the form of a parameter sensitive analysis. This experimentation has been conducted using the Traveling Salesman Problem as benchmarking problem, and adopting two QUBOs: state-of-the-art and a heuristically generated. Our analysis has been performed on a single 7-noded instance, and it is based on more than 200 different parameter configurations, comprising more than 3700 unitary runs and 7 million of quantum reads. Thanks to this study, findings related to the energy distribution and most appropriate parameter settings have been obtained. Finally, an additional study has been performed, aiming to determine the efficiency of the heuristically built QUBO in further TSP instances.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.