Paper detail

Analyzing DISH for Multi-Channel MAC Protocols in Wireless Networks

For long, node cooperation has been exploited as a data relaying mechanism. However, the wireless channel allows for much richer interaction between nodes. One such scenario is in a multi-channel environment, where transmitter-receiver pairs may make incorrect decisions (e.g., in selecting channels) but idle neighbors could help by sharing information to prevent undesirable consequences (e.g., data collisions). This represents a Distributed Information SHaring (DISH) mechanism for cooperation and suggests new ways of designing cooperative protocols. However, what is lacking is a theoretical understanding of this new notion of cooperation. In this paper, we view cooperation as a network resource and evaluate the availability of cooperation via a metric, $p_{co}$, the probability of obtaining cooperation. First, we analytically evaluate $p_{co}$ in the context of multi-channel multi-hop wireless networks. Second, we verify our analysis via simulations and the results show that our analysis accurately characterizes the behavior of $p_{co}$ as a function of underlying network parameters. This step also yields important insights into DISH with respect to network dynamics. Third, we investigate the correlation between $p_{co}$ and network performance in terms of collision rate, packet delay, and throughput. The results indicate a near-linear relationship, which may significantly simplify performance analysis for cooperative networks and suggests that $p_{co}$ be used as an appropriate performance indicator itself. Throughout this work, we utilize, as appropriate, three different DISH contexts --- model-based DISH, ideal DISH, and real DISH --- to explore $p_{co}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.