Paper detail

Analyzing 3D Volume Segmentation by Low-level Perceptual Cues, High-level Cognitive Tasks, and Decision-making Processes

3D volume segmentation is a fundamental task in many scientific and medical applications. Producing accurate segmentations efficiently is challenging, in part due to low imaging data quality (e.g., noise and low image resolution) and ambiguity in the data that can only be resolved with higher-level knowledge of the structure. Automatic algorithms do exist, but there are many use cases where they fail. The gold standard is still manual segmentation or review. Unfortunately, even for an expert, manual segmentation is laborious, time consuming, and prone to errors. Existing 3D segmentation tools are often designed based on the underlying algorithm, and do not take into account human mental models, their lower-level perception abilities, and higher-level cognitive tasks. Our goal is to analyze manual segmentation using the critical decision method (CDM) in order to gain a better understanding of the low-level (perceptual and marking) actions and higher-level decision-making processes that segmenters use. A key challenge we faced is that decision-making consists of an accumulated set of low-level visual-spatial decisions that are inter-related and difficult to articulate verbally. To address this, we developed a novel hybrid protocol which integrates CDM with eye-tracking, observation, and targeted questions. In this paper, we develop and validate data coding schemes for this hybrid data set that discern segmenters' low-level actions, higher-level cognitive tasks, overall task structures, and decision-making processes. We successfully detect the visual processing changes based on tasks sequences and micro decisions reflected in the eye-gaze data and identified different segmentation decision strategies utilized by the segmenters.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.