Paper detail

Analytical Solutions for Radiation-Driven Winds in Massive Stars. I: The Fast Regime

Accurate massloss rate estimates are crucial keys to study wind properties of massive stars and test different evolutionary scenarios. From a theoretical point of view, this implies to solve a complex set of differential equations in which the radiation field and the hydrodynamics are strong coupled. The use of analytical expression to represent the radiation force and the solution of the equation of motion have many advantages over numerical integrations. Therefore, in this work, we present an analytical expression as solution of the equation of motion for radiation driven winds, in terms of the force multipliers parameters. This analytical expression is obtained by employing the line acceleration expression given by Villata (1992) and the methodology proposed by Mueller and Vink (2008). On the other hand, we find useful relationships to determine the parameters for the line acceleration given by Mueller and Vink (2008) in terms of the force multiplier parameters.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.