Paper detail

Analytical benchmark for non-equilibrium radiation diffusion in finite size systems

Non-equilibrium radiation diffusion is an important mechanism of energy transport in Inertial Confinement Fusion, astrophysical plasmas, furnaces and heat exchangers. In this paper, an analytical solution to the non-equilibrium Marshak diffusion problem in a planar slab and spherical shell of finite thickness is presented. Using Laplace transform method, the radiation and material energy densities are obtained as a function of space and time. The variation in integrated energy densities and leakage currents are also studied. In order to linearize the radiation transport and material energy equation, the heat capacity is assumed to be proportional to the cube of the material temperature. The steady state energy densities show linear variation along the depth of the planar slab, whereas non-linear dependence is observed for the spherical shell. The analytical energy densities show good agreement with those obtained from finite difference method using small mesh width and time step. The benchmark results obtained in this work can be used to validate and verify non equilibrium radiation diffusion computer codes in both planar and spherical geometry.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.