Paper detail

Analytical approach to optimizing alternating current biasing of bolometers

Bolometers are most often biased by alternating current (AC) in order to get rid of low-frequency noises that plague direct current (DC) amplification systems. When stray capacitance is present, the respon- sivity of the bolometer differs significantly from the expectations of the classical theories. We develop an analytical model that facilitates the optimization of the AC readout electronics design and tuning. This model is applied to cases similar to the bolometers in the Planck space mission. We study how the re- sponsivity and the noise equivalent power (NEP) of an AC biased bolometer depend on these essential parameters: bias current, heat sink temperature and background power, modulation frequency of the bias, and stray capacitance. We show that the optimal AC bias current in the bolometer is significantly different from that of the DC case as soon as a stray capacitance is present due to the difference in the electrothermal feedback. We also compare the performance of square and sine bias currents and show a slight theoretical advantage for the latter. This work resulted from the need to be able to predict the real behavior of AC biased bolometers in an extended range of working parameters. It proved to be applicable to optimize the tuning of the Planck High-Frequency Instrument bolometers.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.