Paper detail

Analytical and Simulation Performance of a Typical User in Random Cellular Network

Spatial Poisson Point Process (PPP) network, whose Base Stations (BS)s are distributed according to a Poisson distribution, is currently used as a accurate model to analyse the performance of a cellular network. Most current work on evaluation of PPP network in Rayleigh fading channels are usually assumed that the BSs have fixed transmission power levels and there is only a Resource Block (RB) or a user in each cell. In this paper, the Rayleigh-Lognormal fading channels are considered, and it is assumed that each cell is allocated $N$ Resource Blocks (RB) to serve M users. Furthermore, the serving and interfering BS of a typical user are assumed to transmit at different power levels. The closed-form expression for the network coverage probability for both low and high SNR is derived by using Gauss-Legendre approximation. The analytical results indicates that the performance of the typical user is proportional to the transmission power and density of BSs when SNR<10 dB and λ<1, and reaches the upper bound when SNR>10 dB or λ>1. The variance of Monte Carlo simulation is considered to verify the stability and accuracy of simulation results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.