Paper detail

Analytic solutions to the Maxwell-London equations and levitation force for a superconducting sphere in a quadrupole field

Recent proposals suggest using magnetically trapped superconducting spheres in the Meissner state to create low-loss mechanical oscillators with long coherence times. In these proposals the derivation of the force on the superconducting sphere and the coupling to the sphere typically relies on a vanishing penetration depth $λ$ as well as a specific symmetry (i.e. restricting the position of the sphere to one axis) or heuristic methods (e.g. assigning an equivalent point magnetic dipole moment to the sphere). In this paper we analytically solve the Maxwell-London equations with appropriate boundary conditions for a superconducting sphere in a quadrupole field. The analytic solutions provide the full field distribution for arbitrary $λ$ and for an arbitrary sphere position as well as the distribution of shielding currents within the sphere. We furthermore calculate the force acting on the sphere and the maximum field over the volume of the sphere. We show that for a certain range of $λ$ the maximum field experienced by the superconducting sphere is actually lower than it is for a non-magnetic sphere.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.