Paper detail

Analytic Solutions for Navarro--Frenk--White Lens Models for Low Characteristic Convergences

The Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) density profile is often used to model gravitational lenses. For low values of the characteristic convergence ($κ_s \ll 1$) of this model - corresponding to galaxy and galaxy group mass scales - a high numerical precision is required in order to accurately compute several quantities in the strong lensing regime. An alternative for fast and accurate computations is to derive analytic approximations in this limit. In this work we obtain analytic solutions for several lensing quantities for elliptical (ENFW) and pseudo-elliptical (PNFW) NFW lens models on the typical scales where gravitational arcs are expected to be formed, in the $κ_s \ll 1$ limit, establishing their domain of validity. We derive analytic solutions for the convergence and shear for these models, obtaining explicit expressions for the iso-convergence contours and constant distortion curves (including the tangential critical curve). We also compute the deformation cross section, which is given in closed form for the circular NFW model and in terms of a one-dimensional integral for the elliptical ones. In addition, we provide a simple expression for the ellipticity of the iso-convergence contours of the pseudo-elliptical models and the connection of characteristic convergences among the PNFW and ENFW models. We conclude that the set of solutions derived here is generally accurate for $κ_s \lesssim 0.1$. For low ellipticities, values up to $κ_s \simeq 0.18$ are allowed. On the other hand, the mapping between PNFW and the ENFW models is valid up to $κ_s \simeq 0.4$. The solutions derived in this work can be used to speed up numerical codes and ensure their accuracy in the low $κ_s$ regime, including applications to arc statistics and other strong lensing observables. (Abridged)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.