Paper detail

Analytic Perturbation Theory in analyzing some QCD observables

The paper is devoted to application of recently devised ghost-free Analytic Perturbation Theory (APT) for analysis of some QCD observables. We start with the discussion of the main problem of the perturbative QCD -- ghost singularities and with the resume of this trouble solution within the APT. By a few examples in the various energy and momentum transfer regions (with the flavor number f=3, 4 and 5) we demonstrate the effect of improved convergence of the APT modified perturbative QCD expansion. Our first observation is that in the APT analysis the three-loop contribution $\sim α_s^3$) is as a rule numerically inessential. This gives raise a hope for practical solution of the well-known problem of asymptotic nature of common QFT perturbation series. The second result is that a usual perturbative analysis of time-like events with the big $π^2$ term in the $α_s^3$ coefficient is not adequate at $s\leq 2 \GeV^2$. In particular, this relates to $τ$ decay. Then, for the &#34;high&#34; (f=5) region it is shown that the common two-loop (NLO, NLLA) perturbation approximation widely used there (at $10 \GeV\lesssim\sqrt{s}\lesssim 170 \GeV$) for analysis of shape/events data contains a systematic negative error of a 1--2 per cent level for the extracted $\bar{alpha}_s^{(2)} $ values. Our physical conclusion is that the $\bar{alpha}_s(M^2_Z)$ value averaged over the f=5 data appreciably differs $<bar{alpha}_s(M^2_Z)>_{f=5}\simeq 0.124$ from the currently accepted &#34;world average&#34; (=0.118).}

preprint2001arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.