Paper detail

Analytic models of dust temperature in high-redshift galaxies

We investigate physical reasons for high dust temperatures ($T_\mathrm{dust}\gtrsim 40$ K) observed in some high-redshift ($z>5$) galaxies using analytic models. We consider two models that can be treated analytically: the radiative transfer (RT) model, {where a broad distribution of values for $T_\mathrm{dust}$ is considered}, and the one-tempearture (one-$T$) model, which assumes {uniform $T_\mathrm{dust}$}. These two extremes {serve to bracket the most realistic scenario}. We adopt the Kennicutt--Schmidt (KS) law to relate stellar radiation field to gas surface density, and vary the dust-to-gas ratio. As a consequence, our model is capable of predicting the relation between the surface density of star formation rate ($Σ_\mathrm{SFR}$) or dust mass ($Σ_\mathrm{dust}$) and $T_\mathrm{dust}$. We show that the high $T_\mathrm{dust}$ observed at $z\gtrsim 5$ favour low dust-to-gas ratios ($\lesssim 10^{-3}$). An enhanced star formation compared with the KS law gives an alternative explanation for the high $T_\mathrm{dust}$. The dust temperatures are similar between the two (RT and one-$T$) models as long as we use ALMA Bands 6--8. We also examine the relation among $Σ_\mathrm{SFR}$, $Σ_\mathrm{dust}$ and $T_\mathrm{dust}$ without assuming the KS law, and confirm the consistency with the actual observational data at $z>5$. In the one-$T$ model, we also examine a clumpy dust distribution, which predicts lower $T_\mathrm{dust}$ because of the leakage of stellar radiation. This enhances the requirement of low dust abundance or high star formation efficiency to explain the observed high $T_\mathrm{dust}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.