Paper detail

Analytic and accurate approximate metrics for black holes with arbitrary rotation in beyond-Einstein gravity using spectral methods

A key obstacle for theory-specific tests of general relativity is the lack of accurate black-hole solutions in beyond-Einstein theories, especially for moderate to high spins. We address this by developing a general framework--based on spectral and pseudospectral methods--to obtain analytic, closed-form spacetimes representing stationary, axisymmetric black holes in effective-field-theory extensions of general relativity to leading order in the coupling constants. The approach models the spacetime (and extra fields) as a stationary, axisymmetric deformation of the Kerr metric in Boyer-Lindquist-like coordinates, expands metric deformations as a spectral series in radius and polar angle, and converts the resulting beyond-Einstein field equations into algebraic equations for the spectral coefficients. For any given spin, these equations are solved via standard linear-algebra methods; the coefficients are then fitted as functions of spin with non-linear functions, yielding fully analytic metrics for rotating black holes in beyond-Einstein theories. We apply this to quadratic gravity theories--dynamical Chern-Simons, scalar-Gauss-Bonnet, and axi-dilaton gravity--obtaining solutions valid for any spin, including near-extremal cases with errors below machine precision for $a \leq 0.9$ and $\lesssim 10^{-8}$ for $a \leq 0.999$. We show that existing slowly-rotating solutions break down at $a \sim (0.2, 0.6)$, depending on approximation order and chosen accuracy. We then use our metrics to compute observables, such as the surface gravity, horizon angular velocity, and the locations of the innermost circular orbit and the photon ring. The framework is general and applicable to other effective-field-theory extensions for black holes of any spin.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.