Paper detail

Analysis-suitable $G^1$ multi-patch parametrizations for $C^1$ isogeometric spaces

One key feature of isogeometric analysis is that it allows smooth shape functions. Indeed, when isogeometric spaces are constructed from $p$-degree splines (and extensions, such as NURBS), they enjoy up to $C^{p-1}$ continuity within each patch. However, global continuity beyond $C^0$ on so-called multi-patch geometries poses some significant difficulties. In this work, we consider planar multi-patch domains that have a parametrization which is only $C^0$ at the patch interface. On such domains we study the $h$-refinement of $C^1$-continuous isogeometric spaces. These spaces in general do not have optimal approximation properties. The reason is that the $C^1$-continuity condition easily over-constrains the solution which is, in the worst cases, fully locked to linears at the patch interface. However, recent studies by Kapl et al. have given numerical evidence that optimal convergence occurs for bilinear two-patch geometries and cubic (or higher degree) $C^1$ splines. This is the starting point of our study. We introduce the class of analysis-suitable $G^1$ geometry parametrizations, which includes piecewise bilinear parametrizations. We then analyze the structure of $C^1$ isogeometric spaces over analysis-suitable $G^1$ parametrizations and, by theoretical results and numerical testing, discuss their approximation properties. We also consider examples of geometry parametrizations that are not analysis-suitable, showing that in this case optimal convergence of $C^1$ isogeometric spaces is prevented.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.