Paper detail

Analysis on 60 GHz Wireless Communications with Beamwidth-Dependent Misalignment

High speed wireless access on 60 GHz spectrum relies on high-gain directional antennas to overcome the severe signal attenuation. However, perfect alignment between transmitting and receiving antenna beams is rare in practice and overheard signals from concurrent transmissions may cause significant interference. In this paper we analyze the impact of antenna beam misalignment on the system performance of 60 GHz wireless access. We quantify the signal power loss caused by beam misalignment and the interference power accumulated from neighboring concurrent transmissions whose signals are leaked either via the main-beam pointing in the similar direction or via side-lobe emission, and derive the probability distribution of the signal to interference plus noise power ratio (SINR). For scenarios where interfering transmitters are distributed uniformly at random, we derive upper and lower bounds on the cumulative distribution function (abbreviated as CDF or c.d.f.) of SINR, which can be easily applied to evaluate system performance. We validate our analytical results by simulations where random nodes are uniformly distributed within a circular hall, and evaluate the sensitivity of average throughput and outage probability against two parameters: the half-power (3 dB) beamwidth to main-lobe beamwidth ratio and the beam misalignment deviation to main-lobe beamwidth ratio. Our results indicate that the derived lower bound performs well when the half-power beamwidth to main-lobe beamwidth ratio or the number of concurrent transmission links is small. When the number of active links is high, it is desirable in antenna design to balance the degradation caused by beam misalignment (wider beam is better) and the interference from concurrent transmission (narrower beam is better).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.