Paper detail

Analysis of UV and EUV emission from impacts on the Sun after 2011 June 7 eruptive flare

On 2011 June 7 debris from a large filament eruption fell back to the Sun causing bright ultraviolet (UV) and extreme ultraviolet (EUV) splashes across the surface. These impacts may give clues on the process of stellar accretion. The aim is to investigate how the impact emission is influenced by structures in the falling ejecta and at the solar surface. We determine the UV and EUV light curves of a sample of impacts. The ballistic impact velocity is estimated from the ejection and landing times and, where possible, compared with the velocity derived by tracking the downflows in SDO/AIA and STEREO/EUVI images. Estimates of the column density before impact are made from the darkness of the falling plasma in the 193 A channel. The impact velocities were between 230 and 450 km/s. All impacts produced bright EUV emission at the impact site but bright UV was only observed when the impacting fragments reached the chromosphere. There was no clear relation between EUV intensity and kinetic energy. Low UV to EUV intensity ratios (I{UV}/I{EUV}) were seen (i) from impacts of low column-density fragments, (ii) when splashes, produced by some impacts, prevented subsequent fragments from reaching the chromosphere, and (iii) from an impact in an active region. The earliest impacts with the lowest velocity (~250 km/s) had the highest I{UV}/I{EUV}. The I{UV}/I{EUV} decreases with impact velocity, magnetic field at the impact site, and EUV ionising flux. Many of the infalling fragments dissipate above the chromosphere either due to ionisation and trapping in magnetic structures, or to them encountering a splash from an earlier impact. If the same happens in accreting stars then the reduced X-ray compared to optical emission that has been observed is more likely due to absorption by the trailing stream than locally at the impact site.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.