Paper detail

Analysis of Time Delays in the Gravitational Lens PG1115+080

We present a new method for determining time delays among the light curves of various images in a gravitational lens. The method is based on constructing a simple model for the source variation and forming a chi squared measure of the agreement of this same variation with all of the lightcurves. While inspired by Press et al. (1992a, b) our approach is different since we do not assume a Gaussian process for the source variation. We apply our method to the light curves of the quadruple gravitational lens PG1115+080 measured by Schechter et al. (1997). Unlike Schechter et al. we include correlated measurement errors in the analysis, as well as the possibility that microlensing may cause different images to vary by different factors in flux. We find a value of 25.0 (+3.3,-3.8) days (95% confidence) for the delay between components B and C (close to the 24 day value of Schechter et al). However, the ratio t_AC/t_BA of the two intermediate delays is poorly determined at 1.13 (+.18,-.17) (68% confidence), close to the value predicted by lens models (1.4) unlike the Schechter et al. value (0.7). The variation ratios of C with respect to A and of A with respect to B are both different from 1, 1.39 (+.16,-.20) and .79 (+.10,-.12) (95% confidence), respectively. This is an indication of a microlensing gradient, and this type of microlensing may allow us to conclude that the size of the quasar optical emission region is about 1000 AU.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.