Paper detail

Analysis of the R-symmetric supersymmetric models including quantum corrections

We study the Minimal R-symmetric Supersymmetric Standard Model (MRSSM) at the quantum level. The thesis consists of two parts. First one treats about the electroweak sector of the model. Among others, it identifies the parameter region allowed by the electroweak precision observables. Since the MRSSM contains an $SU(2)_L$-triplet with a non-zero vacuum expectation value the emphasis is put on the calculation of the $W$ boson mass. To that end, a full one-loop calculation of $m_W$ augmented with the leading two-loop SM result is presented. The region is then checked against the measurement of the Higgs boson mass. For this, the full one-loop and leading two-loop corrections to the Higgs boson mass in the MRSSM are calculated. Devised benchmark points, consistent with both of these observables, are shown to fulfill also a number of additional experimental constraints like properties of the Higgs boson(s), $b$-physics observables and vacuum stability. Correlating all of these observables allows to put bounds on the parameters of the model. Second part of the thesis treats about the strongly interacting scalar sector. First, NLO QCD corrections to the production of scalar gluon (sgluon) pair at the LHC are calculated. A set of $K$-factors for a selected sgluon masses at 13 and 14 TeV LHC is presented. This calculation is applied to constrain the sgluon mass using 2015 data set from Run 2 of the LHC. To that end, a same-sign lepton search by ATLAS is recasted for the case of the production of the sgluon pair decaying to $t\bar{t}$ pairs. The analysis is reproduced with the help of shower Monte Carlo softwares and the program performing a fast detector response simulation. The analysis shows that already using 3.2/fb of integrated luminosity the exclusion limits from Run 2 are competitive with the 8 TeV ones.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.