Paper detail

Analysis of the observed and intrinsic durations of gamma-ray bursts with known redshift

The duration distribution of 408 GRBs with measured both duration $T_{90}$ and redshift $z$ is examined. Mixtures of a number of distributions (standard normal, skew-normal, sinh-arcsinh, and alpha-skew-normal) are fitted to the observed and intrinsic durations using the maximum log-likelihood method. The best fit is chosen via the Akaike information critetion. The aim of this work is to assess the presence of the presumed intermediate GRB class, and to provide a phenomenological model more appropriate than the common mixture of standard Gaussians. While $\log T^{obs}_{90}$ are well described by a truly trimodal fit, after moving to the rest frame the statistically most significant fit is unimodal. To trace the source of this discrepancy, 334 GRBs observed only by $Swift$/BAT are examined in the same way. In the observer frame, this results in a number of statistically plausible descriptions, being uni- and bimodal, and with the number of components ranging from one to three. After moving to the rest frame, no unambiguous conclusions may be put forward. It is concluded that the size of the sample is not big enough to infer reliably GRB properties based on a univariate statistical reasoning only.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.