Paper detail

Analysis of the nutrient uptake by roots in fixed volume of soil as predicted by fixed boundary, moving boundary and architectural models

This work examines the relevance of the one-dimensional models used to study the influx and the cumulative uptake of nutrient by roots. The physical models studied are the fixed boundary model (Barber and Cushman 1981) and an improved version of our moving boundary model (Reginato et al. 2000). A weight averaged expression to compute influx on root surface and a generalized formula to estimate the cumulative nutrient uptake are used. The moving boundary model problem is solved by the adaptive finite element method. For comparison of simulations of influx and cumulative uptake versus observed results six set of data extracted from literature are used. For ions without limitations of availability fixed and moving boundary models produces similar results with small errors. Instead, to low concentrations, the fixed boundary model over predicts while the moving boundary model always produces better results mainly for K. For the P uptake the moving boundary model produces better results only when the concentrations are very low and their predictions are comparable to the obtained by a 3D-architectural model. The obtained improvements would explain any failures of previous models for ions of low availability. Therefore, our model could be a simpler alternative due to its low computational burden.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.