Paper detail

Analysis of the Massive Eclipsing Binary V1441\,Aql

We present new spectroscopic observations of the early type, double-lined eclipsing binary V1441\,Aql. The radial velocities and the available photometric data obtained by $ASAS$ is analysed for deriving the parameters of the components. The components of V1441\,Aql are shown to be a B3\,IV primary with a mass M$_p$=8.02$\pm$0.51 M$_{\odot}$ and radius R$_p$=7.33$\pm$0.19 R$_{\odot}$ and a B9 III secondary with a mass M$_s$=1.92$\pm$0.14 M$_{\odot}$ and radius R$_s$=4.22$\pm$0.11 R$_{\odot}$. Our analyses show that V1441\,Aql is a double-contact system with rapidly rotating components. Based on the position of the components plotted on the theoretical Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, we estimate that the ages of V1441\,Aql is about 30\,Myr, neglecting the effects of mass exchange between the components. Using the UBVJHK magnitudes and interstellar absorption we estimated the mean distance to the system V1441\,Aql as 550$\pm$25\,pc.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.