Paper detail

Analysis of the fraction of clear sky at the La Palma and Mt Graham sites

The fraction of available telescope time is one of the most important requirements for selecting astronomical sites affecting the performance of ground based telescopes. A quantitative survey of clouds coverage at La Palma and Mt.Graham is presented using both ground and satellite based data. The aim of this work is deriving clear nights for the satellite infrared channels and verifying the results using ground based observations. At La Palma we found a mean percentage of clear nights of 62.6% from ground and 71.9% from satellite. Taking into account the fraction of common nights we found a concordance of 80.7% clear nights from ground and satellite. At Mt.Graham we found a 97% of agreement between Columbine heliograph and night time observing log. From Columbine heliograph and TOMS-OMI satellite we found about 45% of clear nights, while satellite data (GOES, TOMS) are much more dispersed than those ones of La Palma. Setting a statistical threshold we retried a comparable seasonal trend between heliograph and satellite.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.