Paper detail

Analysis of the decay constants of the heavy pseudoscalar mesons with QCD sum rules

In this article, we recalculate the contributions of all vacuum condensates up to dimension-6, in particular the one-loop corrections to the quark condensates $α_s<\bar{q}q>$ and partial one-loop corrections to the four-quark condensates $α_s^2<\bar{q}q>^2$, in the operator product expansion. Then we study the masses and decay constants of the heavy pseudoscalar mesons $D$, $D_s$, $B$ and $B_s$ using the QCD sum rules with two choices: {\bf I} we choose the $\bar{MS}$ masses by setting $m=m(μ)$ and take perturbative corrections up to the order $\mathcal{O}(α_s)$; {\bf II} we choose the pole masses $m$, take perturbative corrections up to the order $\mathcal{O}(α_s^2)$ and set the energy-scale to be the heavy quark pole mass $μ=m_Q$. In the case of {\bf I}, the predictions $f_D=(208\pm11)\,\rm{MeV}$ and $f_B=(189\pm15)\,\rm{MeV}$ are consistent with the experimental data within uncertainties, while the prediction $f_{D_s}=(241\pm12)\,\rm{MeV}$ is below the lower bound of the experimental data $f_{D_s}=(260.0\pm5.4)\,\rm{MeV}$. In the case of {\bf II}, the predictions $f_D=(211\pm14)\,\rm{MeV}$, $f_B=(190\pm17)\,\rm{MeV}$, $f_{D_s}=(258\pm13)\,\rm{MeV}$ and $f_{D_s}/f_D=1.22\pm0.08$ are all in excellent agreements with the experimental data within uncertainties.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.