Paper detail

Analysis of simple scattering models on the thermoelectric performance of analytical electron dispersions

Recent first-principles electron-phonon scattering calculations of heavily-doped semiconductors suggest that a simple DOS scattering model, wherein the electronic scattering rates are assumed to be proportional to the density-of-states, better approximates the rigorous scattering characteristics compared to the commonly used constant relaxation-time and constant mean-free-path approximations. This work investigates how the thermoelectric properties predicted with the DOS model compare to the other two scattering models, using three analytical electron dispersions (parabolic band in 3D/2D/1D, Kane band in 3D/2D/1D, and ring-shaped quartic band in 2D). Our findings show that the scattering models can lead to significant differences, and can disagree about whether certain band structures can provide benefits. A constant relaxation-time is found to always be optimistic compared to a constant mean-free-path, while the DOS scattering model shows no such clear trend. Notably, the 1D parabolic band and 2D quartic band exhibit the highest power factors with the DOS model, resulting from a rapid decrease in density-of-states, and thus scattering - suggesting a possible strategy for improved thermoelectrics based on engineering band structures with sharp/discontinuous drops in density-of-states. The DOS scattering approximation also suggests that searches for materials with a delta function-like DOS (as a proxy to the transport distribution) or converged bands may yield limited benefits, due to the increase in scattering. This work highlights the importance of simple and accurate scattering models when rigorous ab-initio scattering calculations are not feasible.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.