Paper detail

Analysis of Processing Pipelines for Indoor Human Tracking using FMCW radar

In this paper, the problem of formulating effective processing pipelines for indoor human tracking is investigated, with the usage of a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar. Specifically, two processing pipelines starting with detections on the Range-Azimuth (RA) maps and the Range-Doppler (RD) maps are formulated and compared, together with subsequent clustering and tracking algorithms and their relevant parameters. Experimental results are presented to validate and assess both pipelines, using a 24 GHz commercial radar platform with 250 MHz bandwidth and 15 virtual channels. Scenarios where 1 and 2 people move in an indoor environment are considered, and the influence of the number of virtual channels and detectors' parameters is discussed. The characteristics and limitations of both pipelines are presented, with the approach based on detections on RA maps showing in general more robust results.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.