Paper detail

Analysis of multiplicity distributions in proton-proton collisions at LHC up to $\sqrt {s}$ = 7 TeV in quantum statistical approach

Proton-proton collisions at new high energies ($\sqrt {s}=$2.36 and 7 TeV) at LHC resulted into a greater mean multiplicities ($<e n >$) of charged particles in the mid-rapidity region than estimated $< n >$s by different models and event generators. Another significant observation in multiplicity data is a change in slope in the distribution of primary charged hadrons in pseudorapidity intervals $|η|<2.4$ at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV. These new observations merit further studies. We consider a two-component model of particle production to analyze the multiplicity distributions of charged hadrons from the proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies $\sqrt{s} = 0.9$ TeV, $\sqrt{s} = 2.36$ TeV and $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV in pseudorapidity intervals $|η|$ of increasing width around the centre-of-mass pseudorapidity $η_{cm} =0$. The model, based on quantum statistical formalism, considers one chaotic and another coherent source of particle productions. The LHC data has been found to be consistent with characteristic features of the model. The analysis provides a reasonable explanation to the observed change in slope in the distribution and suggests a possible reason for underestimations of mean multiplicities by the event generators. In addition, an interesting revelation is the deviation from a scaling law, involving information entropy in quantum statistical viewpoint, derived as a function of chaotic multiplicity obtained from the two-component model.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.