Paper detail

Analysis of Metagenome Composition by the Method of Random Primers

Metagenome, a mixture of different genomes (as a rule, bacterial), represents a pattern, and the analysis of its composition is, currently, one of the challenging problems of bioinformatics. In the present study, the possibility of evaluating metagenome composition by DNA-marker methods is investigated. These methods are based on using primers, short nucleic acid fragments. Each primer picks out of the tested genome the fragment set specific just for this genome, which is called its spectrum (for the given primer) and is used for identifying the genome. The DNA-marker method, applied to a metagenome, also gives its spectrum, which, obviously, represents the union of the spectra of all genomes belonging to the metagenome. Thus each primer provides a projection of the genomes and of the metagenome onto the corresponding spectra set. Here we propose to apply the random projection (random primer) approach for analyzing metagenome composition and present some estimates of the method effectiveness for the case of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technology.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.