Paper detail

Analysis of LGM Model for sEMG Signals related to Weight Training

Statistical models of Surface electromyography (sEMG) signals have several applications such as better understanding of sEMG signal generation, improved pattern recognition based control of wearable exoskeletons and prostheses, improving training strategies in sports activities, and EMG simulation studies. Most of the existing studies analysed the statistical model of sEMG signals acquired under isometric contractions. However, there is no study that addresses the statistical model under isotonic contractions. In this work, a new dataset, electromyography analysis of human activities - database 2 (EMAHA-DB2) is developed. It consists of two experiments based on both isometric and isotonic activities during weight training. Previously, a novel Laplacian-Gaussian Mixture (LGM) model was demonstrated for a few benchmark datasets consisting of basic movements and gestures. In this work, the model suitability analysis is extended to the EMAHA-DB2 dataset. Further, the LGM model is compared with three existing statistical models including the recent scale-mixture model. According to qualitative and quantitative analyses, the LGM model has a better fit to the empirical pdf of the recorded sEMG signals compared with the scale mixture model and the other standard models. The variance and mixing weight of the Laplacian component of the signal are analyzed with respect to the type of muscle, type of muscle contraction, dumb-bell weight and training experience of the subjects. The sEMG variance (the Laplacian component) increases with respect to the weights, is greater for isotonic activity especially for the biceps. For isotonic activity, the signal variance increases with training experience. Importantly, the ratio of the variances from the two muscle sites is observed to be nearly independent of the lifted weight and consistently increases with the training experience.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.