Paper detail

Analysis of Large Unreliable Stochastic Networks

In this paper a stochastic model of a large distributed system where users' files are duplicated on unreliable data servers is investigated. Due to a server breakdown, a copy of a file can be lost, it can be retrieved if another copy of the same file is stored on other servers. In the case where no other copy of a given file is present in the network, it is definitively lost. In order to have multiple copies of a given file, it is assumed that each server can devote a fraction of its processing capacity to duplicate files on other servers to enhance the durability of the system. A simplified stochastic model of this network is analyzed. It is assumed that a copy of a given file is lost at some fixed rate and that the initial state is optimal: each file has the maximum number $d$ of copies located on the servers of the network. Due to random losses, the state of the network is transient and all files will be eventually lost. As a consequence, a transient $d$-dimensional Markov process $(X(t))$ with a unique absorbing state describes the evolution this network. By taking a scaling parameter $N$ related to the number of nodes of the network. a scaling analysis of this process is developed. The asymptotic behavior of $(X(t))$ is analyzed on time scales of the type $t\mapsto N^p t$ for $0\leq p\leq d{-}1$. The paper derives asymptotic results on the decay of the network: Under a stability assumption, the main results state that the critical time scale for the decay of the system is given by $t\mapsto N^{d-1}t$. When the stability condition is not satisfied, it is shown that the state of the network converges to an interesting local equilibrium which is investigated. As a consequence it sheds some light on the role of the key parameters $λ$, the duplication rate and $d$, the maximal number of copies, in the design of these systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.