Paper detail

Analysis of Keck High Resolution Spectra of VB10

We use a preliminary version of our ``NextGen'' grid of cool star model atmospheres to compute synthetic line profiles which fit high resolution Keck spectra of the cool M~dwarf VB10 satisfactorily well. We show that the parameters derived from the Keck data are consistent with the parameters derived from lower resolution spectra with larger wavelength coverage. We discuss the treatment of van der Waals broadening in cool, molecular (mostly ${\rm H_2}$) dominated stellar atmospheres. The line profiles are dominated by van der Waals pressure broadening and are a sensitive indicator for the gravity and metallicity. Therefore, the high-resolution Keck spectra are useful for determining the parameters of M dwarfs. There is some ambiguity between the metallicity and gravity. For VB10, we find from the high-resolution spectra that $ 5.0 < \log(g) < 5.5$ and $0 < \left[\case{\rm M}{\rm H}\right] < +0.5$ for an adopted fixed effective temperature of 2700~K (Schweitzer, 1995), which is consistent with recent interior calculations (Baraffe etal, 1995).

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.