Paper detail

Analysis of interval constants of Shoushili-affiliated calendars

We study the interval constants that are related to the motions of the Sun and the Moon, i.e., the Qi, Intercalation, Revolution, and Crossing interval constants, in calendars affiliated with the Shoushi calendar(Shoushili), such as Datongli and Chiljeongsannaepyeon. It is known that those interval constants were newly introduced in Shoushili and revised afterward, except for the Qi interval constant, and the revised values were adopted in the Shoushili-affiliated calendars. In this paper, we investigate first the accuracy of the interval constants and then the accuracy of the Shoushili-affilated calendars in terms of the interval constants by comparing the times of the new moon and the solar eclipse maximum calculated by each calendar with modern calculations. During our study, we found that the Qi and Intercalation interval constants used in the early Shoushili were well determined, whereas the Revolution and Crossing interval constants were relatively poorly measured. We also found that the interval constants used by the early Shoushili were better than those of the later one, and hence than those of Datongli and Chiljeongsannaepyeon. On the other hand, we found that the early Shoushili is, in general, a worse calendar than Datongli for use in China but a better one than Chiljeongsannaepyeon for use in Korea in terms of the new moon and the solar eclipse times, at least for the period 1281 - 1644. Finally, we verified that the sunrise and sunset times recorded in Shoushili-Li-Cheng and Mingshi are those at Beijing and Nanjing, respectively.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.