Paper detail

Analysis of HST WFPC2 Observations of Centaur 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 while in Outburst to Place Constraints on the Nucleus' Rotation State

We present analysis of {\it Hubble Space Telescope} (HST) observations of Centaur 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 (SW1) while in outburst to characterize the outburst coma and place constraints on the nucleus' spin state. The observations consist of Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) images from Cycle 5, GO-5829 (Feldman (1995)) acquired on UT 1996 March 11.3 and 12.1, which serendipitously imaged the Centaur shortly after a major outburst. A multi-component coma was detected consisting of: an expanding outburst dust coma with complex morphology possessing an east-west asymmetry and north-south symmetry contained within 5$''$ ($\sim$19,000 km) of the nucleus, the residual dust shell of an earlier UT 1996 February outburst, and a nearly circular underlying quiescent activity level coma detectable to $\sim$70$''$ ($\sim$267,000 km) away from the nucleus. Photometry of the calibrated WFPC2 images resulted in a measured 5$''$ radius aperture equivalent R-band magnitude of 12.86 $\pm$ 0.02 and an estimated (2.79 $\pm$ 0.05)$\times 10^8$ kg for the lower limit of dust material emitted during the outburst. No appreciable evolution of morphologic features, indicating signatures of nucleus rotation, were detected between the two imaging epochs. The observations were modeled using a 3-D Monte Carlo coma model (Samarasinha (2000)) to place constraints on the nucleus' rotation state. Modeling indicated the morphology is representative of a non-isotropic ejection of dust emitted during a single outburst event with a duration on the order of hours from a single source region corresponding to $\sim$1\% of the surface area. A spin period with lower limit on the order of days is suggested to reproduce the coma morphology seen in the observations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.