Paper detail

Analysis of High Dimensional Compositional Data Containing Structural Zeros with Applications to Microbiome Data

This paper is motivated by the recent interest in the analysis of high dimen- sional microbiome data. A key feature of this data is the presence of `structural zeros' which are microbes missing from an observation vector due to an underlying biological process and not due to error in measurement. Typical notions of missingness are insufficient to model these structural zeros. We define a general framework which allows for structural zeros in the model and propose methods of estimating sparse high dimensional covariance and precision matrices under this setup. We establish error bounds in the spectral and frobenius norms for the proposed esti- mators and empirically support them with a simulation study. We also apply the proposed methodology to the global human gut microbiome data of Yatsunenko (2012).

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.