Paper detail

Analysis of Hand-Crafted and Automatic-Learned Features for Glaucoma Detection Through Raw Circmpapillary OCT Images

Taking into account that glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness worldwide, we propose in this paper three different learning methodologies for glaucoma detection in order to elucidate that traditional machine-learning techniques could outperform deep-learning algorithms, especially when the image data set is small. The experiments were performed on a private database composed of 194 glaucomatous and 198 normal B-scans diagnosed by expert ophthalmologists. As a novelty, we only considered raw circumpapillary OCT images to build the predictive models, without using other expensive tests such as visual field and intraocular pressure measures. The results ratify that the proposed hand-driven learning model, based on novel descriptors, outperforms the automatic learning. Additionally, the hybrid approach consisting of a combination of both strategies reports the best performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 and an accuracy of 0.82 during the prediction stage.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.