Paper detail

Analysis of Galactic late-type O dwarfs: more constraints on the weak wind problem

We have investigated the stellar and wind properties of a sample of five late-type O dwarfs in order to address the weak wind problem. A grid of TLUSTY models was used to obtain the stellar parameters, and the wind parameters were determined by using the CMFGEN code. We found that the spectra have mainly a photospheric origin. A weak wind signature is seen in CIV 1549, from where mass-loss rates consistent with previous CMFGEN results regarding O8-9V stars were obtained. A discrepancy of roughly 2 orders of magnitude is found between these mass-loss rates and the values predicted by theory (Mdot(Vink)), confirming a breakdown or a steepening of the modified wind momentum-luminosity relation at log L/Lsun < 5.2. We have estimated the carbon abundance for the stars of our sample and concluded that its uncertainty cannot cause the weak wind problem. Upper limits on Mdot were established for all objects using lines of different ions, namely, PV 1118,28, CIII 1176, NV 1239,43, Si IV 1394,03, and NIV 1718. All the values obtained are also in disagreement with theoretical predictions, bringing support to the reality of weak winds. Together with CIV 1549, the use of NV 1239,43 results in the lowest mass-loss rates: the upper limits indicate that Mdot must be less than about -1.0 dex Mdot(Vink). Regarding the other transitions, the upper limits still point to low rates: Mdot must be less than about $(-0.5 \pm 0.2)$ dex Mdot(Vink). We have studied the behavior of the Halpha line with different mass-loss rates. We have also explored ways to fit the observed spectra with Mdot(Vink). By using large amounts of X-rays, we verified that few wind emissions take place, as in weak winds. However, unrealistic X-rays luminosities had to be used (log Lx/Lbol > -3.5) (abridged).

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.