Paper detail

Analysis of deviation from neoclassical ion equilibrium against electron and ion temperature profiles in T-10 tokamak

The results of the analysis of the deviation of the force equilibrium for ions from the neoclassical theory prediction, calculated using the direct measurements of the radial electric field, in the view of its possible local and nonlocal correlation with the profiles of electron, Te, and ion, Ti, temperatures in the T-10 tokamak are presented. Local correlations are analyzed by means of the Pearson's correlation. Nonlocal correlations are treated with an inverse problem under the assumption of an integral equation relationship between the deviation and Te and Ti profiles. The discharges with zero, weak and strong auxiliary heating (electron cyclotron resonance heating) are analyzed. It is found that the electrons substantially (not less than ions) contribute to the deviation of the ion equilibrium from the neoclassical theory prediction both in the local and nonlocal models.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.