Paper detail

Analysis of chemical abundances in planetary nebulae with [WC] central stars. I. Line intensities and physical conditions

(Abridged) Planetary nebulae (PNe) around Wolf-Rayet [WR] central stars ([WR]PNe) constitute a particular photoionized nebula class that represents about 10% of the PNe with classified central stars. We analyse deep high-resolution spectrophotometric data of 12 [WR]PNe. This sample represents the most extensive analysed so far, at such high spectral resolution. We aim to select the optimal physical conditions in the PNe to be used in ionic abundance calculations that will be presented in a forthcoming paper. We acquired spectra at LCO with the 6.5-m telescope and the MIKE spectrograph, covering a wavelength range from 3350 to 9400 A. The spectra were exposed deep enough to detect, with signal-to-noise ratio higher than three, the weak ORLs of OII, CII, and other species. We detect and identify about 2980 emission lines, which, to date, is the most complete set of spectrophotometric data published for this type of objects. From our deep data, numerous diagnostic line ratios for Te and Ne are determined from CELs, ORLs, and continuum measurements. Densities are closely described by the average of all determined values for objects with ne<10^4 cm-3, and by ne([Cl III]) for the densest objects. For Te, we adopt a three-zone ionization scheme, where the low ionization zone is characterized by Te([NII]), the medium ionization zone by Te([OIII]) and the highest ionization one by Te([ArIV]) when available. We compute Te from the HI Paschen discontinuity and from HeI lines. We do not find evidences of the presence of low-temperature, high-density clumps in our [WR]PNe from the analysis of faint O II and N II plasma diagnostics. The behaviour of Te([OIII])/Te([NII]) being very low for high ionization degrees can be reproduced by a set of combined matter-bounded and radiation-bounded models, however, for the lowest temperature ratios, too high metallicity seem required.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.