Paper detail

Analysis of central Hox protein types across bilaterian clades: On the origin of central Hox proteins from an Antennapedia/Hox7-like ancestor

Hox proteins are one of the best studied sets of transcription factors in developmental biology. They are major determinants for establishing morphological differences along the anterior-posterior axis of animals and are generally regarded as highly conserved in function. This view is based on experiments comparing a few (anterior) Hox proteins, however, the extent to which central or abdominal Hox proteins share sequence features or functions remains largely unexplored. To shed light on the origin and functional divergence of the central Hox proteins, we combine a powerful bioinformatics tool (CLANS) with a large-scale phylogeny of species. CLANS is used to differentiate between the various types of central Hox protein sequences, while the phylogeny provides an evolutionary context to the analysis. The combination of both enables us to infer the relative timepoint at which a given central Hox protein type arose. We identify seven distinct central Hox protein sequence types, only one of which is common to all protostome and deuterostome clades (Antp/Hox7). Together, these results lead us to suggest reevaluating the usefulness of the increasingly depicted synteny-based classification scheme that assumes a one-to-one orthology between protostome and deuterostome central Hox proteins. Instead, we propose that the use of sequence-based classification schemes able to resolve the central and posterior Hox proteins provides a more promising and biologically meaningful alternative to resolving these groups. This analysis, which provides a unique overview of the Hox protein sequence types present across protostomes and deuterostomes as well as a relative dating for the emergence of the central Hox protein types, provides a crucial clue to illuminate how and when the distinct developmental blueprints for organisms evolved within the evolutionarily immensely successful bilaterian lineage.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.