Paper detail

Analysis of Artificial Dissipation of Explicit and Implicit Time-Integration Methods

Stability is an important aspect of numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws and has received much interest. However, continuity in time is often assumed and only semidiscrete stability is studied. Thus, it is interesting to investigate the influence of explicit and implicit time integration methods on the stability of numerical schemes. If an explicit time integration method is applied, spacially stable numerical schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws can result in unstable fully discrete schemes. Focusing on the explicit Euler method (and convex combinations thereof), undesired terms in the energy balance trigger this phenomenon and introduce an erroneous growth of the energy over time. In this work, we study the influence of artificial dissipation and modal filtering in the context of discontinuous spectral element methods to remedy these issues. In particular, lower bounds on the strength of both artificial dissipation and modal filtering operators are given and an adaptive procedure to conserve the (discrete) $\mathbf{L}_2$ norm of the numerical solution in time is derived. This might be beneficial in regions where the solution is smooth and for long time simulations. Moreover, this approach is used to study the connections between explicit and implicit time integration methods and the associated energy production. By adjusting the adaptive procedure, we demonstrate that filtering in explicit time integration methods is able to mimic the dissipative behavior inherent in implicit time integration methods. This contribution leads to a better understanding of existing algorithms and numerical techniques, in particular the application of artificial dissipation as well as modal filtering in the context of numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws together with the selection of explicit or implicit time integration methods.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.