Paper detail

Analysis of a three flavor neutrino oscillation fit to recent Super-Kamiokande data

We have analyzed the most recent available Super-Kamiokande data in a three flavor neutrino oscillation model. We have here neglected possible matter effects and performed a fit to atmospheric and solar Super-Kamiokande data. We have investigated a large parameter range, where the mixing angles were restricted to $0 \leq θ_i \leq π/2$, $ i=1,2,3$, and the mass squared differences were taken to be in the intervals $10^{-11} {\rm eV}^2 \leq Δm^2 \leq 10^{-2} {\rm eV}^2$ and $10^{-4} {\rm eV}^2 \leq ΔM^2 \leq 10 {\rm eV}^2$. This yielded a best solution characterized by the parameter values $θ_1 \simeq 45^\circ$, $θ_2 \simeq 10^\circ$, $θ_3 \simeq 45^\circ$, $Δm^2 \simeq 4.4 \times 10^{-10} {\rm eV}^2$, and $ΔM^2 \simeq 1.01 \times 10^{-3} {\rm eV}^2$, which shows that the analyzed experimental data speak in favor of a bimaximal mixing scenario with one of the mass squared differences in the ``just-so'' domain and the other one in the range capable of providing a solution to the atmospheric neutrino problem.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.