Paper detail

Analysis and Empirical Validation of Visible Light Path Loss Model for Vehicular Sensing and Communication

Advancements in lighting systems and photodetectors provide opportunities to develop viable alternatives to conventional communication and sensing technologies, especially in the vehicular industry. Most of the studies that propose visible light in communication or sensing adopt the Lambertian propagation (path loss) model. This model requires knowledge and utilization of multiple parameters to calculate the path loss such as photodetector area, incidence angle, and distance between transmitter and receiver. In this letter, a simplified path loss model that is mathematically more tractable is proposed for vehicular sensing and communication systems that use visible light technology. Field measurement campaigns are conducted to validate the performance and limits of the developed path loss model. The proposed model is used to fit the data collected at different ranges of incident angles and distances. Further, this model can be used for designing visible light-based communication and sensing systems to minimize the complexity of the Lambertian path loss model, particularly for cases where the incident angle between transmitter and receiver is relatively small.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.