Paper detail

Analyses on the Variability Asymmetry of Kepler AGNs

The high quality light curves of Kepler space telescope make it possible to analyze the optical variability of AGNs with an unprecedented time resolution. Studying the asymmetry in variations could give independent constraints on the physical models for AGN variability. In this paper, we use Kepler observations of 19 sources to perform analyses on the variability asymmetry of AGNs. We apply smoothing-correction to light curves to deduct the bias to high frequency variability asymmetry, caused by long term variations which are poorly sampled due to the limited length of light curves. A parameter $β$ based on structure functions is introduced to quantitively describe the asymmetry and its uncertainty is measured using extensive Monte-Carlo simulations. Individual sources show no evidence of asymmetry at timescales of $1\sim20$ days and there is not a general trend toward positive or negative asymmetry over the whole sample. Stacking data of all 19 AGNs, we derive averaged $\barβ$ of 0.00$\pm$0.03 and -0.02$\pm$0.04 over timescales of 1$\sim$5 days and 5$\sim$20 days, respectively, statistically consistent with zero. Quasars and Seyfert galaxies show similar asymmetry parameters. Our results indicate that short term optical variations in AGNs are highly symmetric.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.